首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

行政处罚的有责性研究
引用本文:申验.行政处罚的有责性研究[J].南华大学学报(社会科学版),2004,5(3):84-87.
作者姓名:申验
作者单位:株洲工学院,法律系,湖南,株洲,412000
摘    要:行政处罚的有责性问题(即被处罚人的主观心态是否以故意或过失为必要),是行政处罚制度中的一个重要的问题。对此问题世界各国的学理见解及制度规定均未形成统一认识,但是,其发展的趋势随着现代民主法治思想的发展是倾向于行政处罚应以有责性为要件的。我国《行政处罚法》虽然没有对行政处罚的有责性作出系统性的规定,但是,对违法者的责任能力、行为能力及主观要件都作了规定。文章试图从刑法相关理论入手,比较国外及我国台湾地区的相关学理及制度,结合我国《行政处罚法》的有关规定,对行政处罚领域的有责性问题进行初步的探讨,并尝试提出建立有中国特色的行政处罚有责性制度的初步设想。

关 键 词:行政处罚  有责性  故意  过失
文章编号:1009-4504(2004)03-0084-04
修稿时间:2004年5月17日

On Responsibility For Administrative Punishment
SHEN Yan.On Responsibility For Administrative Punishment[J].Journal of Nanhua University(Social Science Edition),2004,5(3):84-87.
Authors:SHEN Yan
Abstract:The issue of responsibility for administrative punishment, that is, whether aforethought or negligence of whom is punished is essential to his subjective psychology, is important in administrative punishment system. There has not been uniform understanding in the world, but with the development of modern democratic thought of rule by law, responsibility tends to be prerequisite for administrative punishment. Though there are no systematic provisions of this issue in Administrative Punishment Law, liability, capacity and subjective factor of breacher are all stipulated. This article analyzes this issue and tries to provide a tentative idea about establishing an administrative punishment responsibility system with Chinese characteristics.
Keywords:Administrative punishment  Responsibility  Aforethought  Negligence    
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《南华大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《南华大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号