首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

再议物权行为理论的几个问题
引用本文:程然然.再议物权行为理论的几个问题[J].郑州航空工业管理学院学报(社会科学版),2006,25(2):115-117.
作者姓名:程然然
作者单位:安徽大学,法学院,安徽,合肥,230039
摘    要:物权行为以其独立性和无因性为支柱。无因性的存在,使物权行为理论的价值受到挑战。而物权行为无因性的相对化则是物权行为理论合理化的必然选择。物权行为无因性理论与善意取得制度没有绝对的优劣之分,在对第三人的保护上,应采取无因性原则,同时吸收善意取得制度的优点即排除对恶意第三人的保护。中国民法典应该吸收物权行为理论中的合理因素。

关 键 词:物权行为  无因性  独立性  善意取得
文章编号:1009-1750(2006)02-0115-03
修稿时间:2006年2月1日

Reflection on the Theory of Juristic Acts of Real Rights
CHENG Ran-ran.Reflection on the Theory of Juristic Acts of Real Rights[J].Journal of Zhengzhou Institute of Aeronautical Industry Management(Social Science Edition),2006,25(2):115-117.
Authors:CHENG Ran-ran
Abstract:The juristic acts of real rights are based on unreason principle and independence principle.The existence of unreason principle makes the value of the theory of the juristic acts of real rights be challenged.To rationalize the theory of the juristic acts of real rights,the inevitably choice is to make unreason principle relativistic.The theory of unreason principle of the juristic acts of real rights is not absolutely better than the bona find gain,and vice versa.On protection of the third person,we should accept unreason principle and the merit of bona fide gain that is to remove the protection of the people with evil intention.The civil law should accept the reasonable factor of the theory of the juristic acts of real rights.
Keywords:juristic acts of real rights  unreason principle  independence principle  bona fide gain
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号