首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

海峡两岸交通犯罪比较研究
引用本文:康均心,赵波.海峡两岸交通犯罪比较研究[J].昆明理工大学学报(社会科学),2011(3):33-42.
作者姓名:康均心  赵波
作者单位:[1]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430072 [2]武汉纺织大学人文社科学院,湖北武汉430074
基金项目:湖北省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目“交通犯罪刑法规制问题研究”(2009q062)
摘    要:交通犯罪是一种复杂的现代型犯罪,海峡两岸都有明确规定。大陆刑法对交通犯罪的罪名排列较为混乱,没有区分普通过失和业务过失并分别配置不同的法定刑,并且刑罚配置单一;台湾"刑法"对交通犯罪区分普通过失与业务过失,就后者配置高于前者的法定刑,并配置罚金刑且将其升格为主刑,这些做法值得大陆研究和借鉴。

关 键 词:海峡两岸  交通犯罪  立法模式  罪名体系  刑罚设置

Comparative Study on Traffic Crime between Mainland China and Taiwan
KANG Jun-xin,ZHAO Bo.Comparative Study on Traffic Crime between Mainland China and Taiwan[J].Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences),2011(3):33-42.
Authors:KANG Jun-xin  ZHAO Bo
Institution:1.Law School of Wuhan University,Wuhan,Hubei,430072,China;2.Humanity and Social Science College of Wuhan Textile University,Wuhan,Hubei,430074,China)
Abstract:As a complex type of modern crimes,Traffic crime has been clearly formulated in Mainland China and Taiwan.Criminal Law of Mainland China arranges traffic crime in a comparative chaotic order,makes no distinguish between ordinary negligence and professional negligence,allocates criminal punishments in a single mode;Criminal Law of Taiwan distinguishes ordinary negligence from professional negligence in traffic crime,allocates higher statutory penalty to the latter,establishes fine penalty and raise its to principal punishment,these practices deserve research and reference of Mainland China.
Keywords:mainland China and Taiwan  traffic crime  legislative pattern  accusation system  penalty allocation
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号