质疑附条件逮捕

2006年8月最高人民检察院制定的《人民检察院审查逮捕质量标准（试行）》确立了“附条件逮捕”制度。该制度的缺陷是：违背刑事诉讼法第60条规定,实质上降低了逮捕条件;背离刑事诉讼的价值目标;制度设立的前提不成立;制度内容模糊,难以避免逮捕适用扩大化和超期羁押现象;为“以捕代侦”合法化提供了方便之门;背离逮捕的基本原则;与刑事赔偿范围相矛盾;缺乏权利监督制约。该制度实质上修改了刑事诉讼法规定,扩张了检察机关的逮捕权,不利于保障犯罪嫌疑人的合法权益。因此,该制度不具有合法性、合理性和正当性,应当予以修改或者废止。

Conditional Arrest in Question

The Supreme People＇s Procuratorate formulated Quality Standards for Examination and Arrest （ Trial ） on August 2006which stipulates a ＂conditional arrest＂. But there exist some deficiencies with the Standards. For example, it runs contrary to Article 60 of the Criminal Law and relaxes the conditions for the arrest essentially; it runs counter to the value of criminal proceedings; there is no premise to the establishment of the regulation; the regulation is implicit, which may engender the applieation expansion of the arrest and extended detention, and the conduct of using arrest to replace investigation. It therefore distracts from the basic principles and does not fit into the scope of criminal compensation. The Standards modifies the Criminal Law and increases the power of arrest of procuratorate organs, and therefore violates the lawful rights of suspects. So the Standards lacks legitimacy, rationality and legitimacy and should be amended or repealed.