元稹"模勒"续考

“独断论”是当今学术研究的弊病。考证“模勒”含义,并非为了论证中唐印刷术之有无,而是为了说明“模勒”一词不足以成为证明中唐已有印刷术的证据,也是为了说明从梁代到有印刷实物的晚唐之间,有一个从印章、拓印技术发展到印刷术的过渡期。

The Continual Investigation of Yuanzhen's Mole

Dogmatism is a malady in the academic research nowadays.The investigation of the Mole is not to argument whether the Tang Dynasty has printing art,but to indicate that the phrase Mole couldn't be the proof that the Tang Dynasty already had the printing art,also to explain that from the Liang Dynasty to the late Tang Dynasty,when the printed things appeared,there was a transition period from the art of signet and print to the printing art.