性文学的人类学解读

从人类学视角对性文学进行批评使我们对这类作品和文学现象所涉及的人、性、文学三者关系有深刻的理解,创作和阅读性文学是人类的性补偿行为之一.性文学的圣洁与肮脏二重性是由于早期人类对性的公私分离,公类的性作为高媒祀典的国家行为抽象而神圣,私类的性才是个人的具体的性行为,由于其和群体、国家利益的远离而肮脏.性文学的书写方式中,"放荡"的美人尤为注目,这与人类早期女(雌)性的以色易食和男性对女性的性爱女神期待和地亩神崇拜有深刻的渊源.一般对性文学的贬损是由于耻感性心理和早期人类的生殖唯一的性意义.当下文学中的"性泛滥"与全球化文化背景下中国文化对西方文化的融汇有关.存在于中国文化积习中的当下性文学并不能真正起到解放人性获得自由的作用.

An Anthropological Understanding of Sex Literature

Criticizing the sex literature from the perspective of anthropology makes it possible for us to better understand the correlations between man, sex and literature in this kind of literature. Creating and reading sex literature is something that compensate for the sexual impulses. The dual features of purity and dinginess in sexliterature are the separation of sex ownership. The sex of the public ownership stands for the rituals of state-level ceremony, and hence abstract and sacred, while the sex of the private ownership is the concrete sexual behavior and is regarded as dingy for its deviation from the collective benefit. Among the ways of creating the sexual literature, depicting debauchery is extremely striking. This is related to the female inferiority in earlier times. The derogation of sex comes from man's shame and sole focus on sex."Sex overflowing"in literature can be linked to the convergence between the western culture and the eastern culture. The contemporary sex literature that exists in the Chinese deeply-rooted habits can not possibly set man free.