Short run responses to foreign exchange crises |
| |
Authors: | Santiago Levy |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Bentley University, Massachusetts, MA 02452, USA;2. The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA;3. Lancaster University, Management School, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YX, United Kingdom;4. Essex Business School, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, United Kingdom;1. Naveen Jindal School of Management, University of Texas at Dallas, 800 W Campbell Rd, Richardson, TX 75080, United States of America;2. Foster School of Business, University of Washington, PACCAR Hall, 4273 E Stevens Way NE, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America |
| |
Abstract: | This paper constructs a short-run general equilibrium model for an LDC-type economy. Some key features are the possibility of excess capacity and the presence of quantitative restrictions on exports and imports. A rich variety of pricing possibilities for tradeable goods is allowed for, including “water in the tariff” as well as domestic prices exceeding world prices with binding import quotas.The model is used to analyze alternative responses to a foreign-exchange crisis. Import controls, devaluation and cuts in government expenditures are compared. We find that: i) import quotas can worsen the balance of trade, ii) rationing foreign exchange for noncompetitive imports is stagflationary, increasing prices even under excess capacity, iii) a devaluation has strong effects on income distribution, although output and employment expand, and iv) cuts in government spending are deflationary but the income distribution effects are neutral. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|