Citizenship: reflections on a relevant but ambivalent concept for persons with disabilities |
| |
Authors: | Anne Waldschmidt Marie Sépulchre |
| |
Institution: | 1. Faculty of Human Sciences, iDiS – International Research Unit in Disability Studies, Department of Special Education and Rehabilitation, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany;2. Department of Sociology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden |
| |
Abstract: | This article examines the significance of citizenship with respect to disability. The article first highlights the idea of citizenship as ‘social contract’. This means the possession of civil, political, economic, cultural and social rights as well as the exercise of duties in society. Due to societal barriers, many disabled persons have difficulties fulfilling citizenship roles. Further, this article draws on citizenship theories; it examines three types of citizenship participation – the social citizen, the autonomous citizen and the political citizen – and discusses their promises and ableist implications. To counterbalance the exclusionary aspects of citizenship, we argue that human rights prove important. At the same time, human rights are more easily proclaimed than enforced and citizenship remains a precondition for effectively implementing human rights. The article concludes that citizenship is a relevant but also ambivalent concept when it comes to disability; it calls for a critical understanding of citizenship in Disability Studies. |
| |
Keywords: | citizenship political theory disability policy human rights nationality |
|
|