前民法典时代的孳息归属问题研究——体系化解读之努力

体系化的解读是社会主义法律体系形成后的必然要求.在所有权保留买卖、动产买卖等领域的孳息归属上,<物权法>第116条与<合同法>第163条有可能存在冲突.目前关于两条之间适用关系的学说相当混乱.从<合同法>第163条的立法意图、民法典构建的体系性原则、比较法渊源以及我国司法实践来看,两者之间的关系类似于同一法律文件中总则规定与分则规定的关系,与通常的法律规范冲突或规范不一致并不相同,两者发生冲突时,无需考虑其新法、旧法的关系,应优先适用<合同法>第163条的规定,而不应适用<物权法>第116条.

The Study on the Attribution of Fruits before the Civil Code Era:An Explanation Adherence to Systems

While the socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics has been formed,it is inevitable that the hermeneutics of law should be adherence to systems.About the attribution of fruits,there is a conflict between Article 116 of Property Law and Article 163 of Contract Law,especially in the case of title retention and estate sales.There is some debate and confusion among the theories.Based on the legal purpose of Article 163,the doctrine of systematic civil code,comparative law,and the judicial practice in...