Gespensterdebatte oder was ist soziologische Aufklärung? |
| |
Authors: | Katrin Auspurg Thomas Hinz Jürgen Güdler |
| |
Institution: | 1. Fachbereich Soziologie, Arbeitsbereich für empirische Sozialforschung, Universit?t Konstanz, Universit?tsstr. 10, 78457, Konstanz, Deutschland 2. Fachbereich Soziologie, Professur für empirische Sozialforschung, Universit?t Konstanz, Universit?tsstr. 10, 78457, Konstanz, Deutschland 3. Bereich Informations-management, DFG, Kennedyallee 40, 53175, Bonn, Deutschland
|
| |
Abstract: | We reply to the critical comments of Richard Münch and the author group Jansen, Heidler and von Goetz on our article “Emergence of an Academic Elite? The Impact of Universities’ Size and Reputation on Research Funding” published in this journal. After reviewing some other sociologists’ statements on Münch’s thesis about the academic elite we reinforce the gain of our empirical analyses of hypotheses of the sociology of science in general, on the Matthew-Effect, and on trends to a possible cartelization and monopolization in the German science system. The main critic of unsuited data (we used applications for single grants submitted to the German Research Foundation) does not adequately consider the postulated scope of the investigated theses and our analyses do not aim at a general evaluation of the “Initative of Excellence”. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|