The principle of double-effect in a clinical context |
| |
Authors: | Rainer Dziewas Christoph Kellinghaus Peter Sörös |
| |
Institution: | 1.Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Universit?tsklinikum Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Strasse 33, 48129 Münster, Germany, |
| |
Abstract: | Whereas indirect euthanasia is a common clinical practice, active euthanasia remains forbidden in most countries. The reason
for this differentiation is usually seen in the principle of double-effect (PDE). PDE states that there is a morally relevant
difference between the intended consequences of an action and merely foreseen, unintended side-effects. This article discloses
the fundamental assumptions presenting the basis for this application of the PDE and examines whether these assumptions are
compatible with the PDE. It is shown that neither a liberal nor a utilitarian point of view makes the utilization of the PDE
possible. In accordance with philosophical tradition, only within the doctrine of the sanctity of life does the PDE seem to
be applicable. By analysing the premises of this doctrine, and comparing them with those of the PDE, the inconsistency of
this idea is demonstrated. It is suggested that the role of the PDE in the current discussion on euthanasia is largely exaggerated.
Electronic Publication |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|