Farm-level constraints on agri-environmental scheme participation: a transactional perspective |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Economics Department, Permoser Str. 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany;2. Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1087, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;1. Wageningen UR, Wageningen Environmental Research, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands;2. Wageningen UR, Wageningen Economic Research, Alexanderveld 5, 2585 DB Den Haag, The Netherlands;3. James Hutton Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, Scotland UK;4. Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, NE1 7RU, England UK;5. INRA, 4 allée Adolphe Bobierre – CS 61103, 35011 Rennes Cedex, France;6. Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, geb. A, 9000 Gent, Belgium;1. Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP), 11 Belgrave Road, IEEP Offices, Floor 3, London SW1 V 1RB, United Kingdom;2. Institut für Agrarökologie und Biodiversität (IFAB), Böcklinstr. 27, D-68163 Mannheim, Germany;1. US ODR, INRAE, Castanet-Tolosan, France;2. CEE-M, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, INRAE, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France;1. Natural England, Foss House, King’s Pool, 1–2 Peasholme Green, York YO1 7PX, UK;2. Countryside and Community Research Institute, University of Gloucestershire, Cheltenham GL50 4AZ, UK |
| |
Abstract: | Voluntary agri-environmental schemes based on management agreements characterise much agri-environmental policy across the EU at present, and have expanded following the implementation of Regulation 2078/92 in all member states. Schemes generally motivate individual farmers to contract with government agencies to produce countryside goods in return for compensatory payments. Hence, farmers’ decisions to participate are central to achieving policy objectives. An enhanced understanding of farmers’ attitudes to and perceptions of schemes and their implementation would be of value for policy development. Recent transactions-cost research has observed that such schemes involve potentially heavy transactions costs, for both the state and farmers. In addition to reducing scheme cost-effectiveness, the transactions costs incurred by farmers can form a significant constraint on participation in schemes, with adverse effects on the supply of conservation goods. This paper considers behavioural and transactional perspectives on scheme participation. Some new data on the transactional burdens experienced by farmers when participating in schemes is examined from the perspective of identifying ways to improve policy transacting to ease constraints on participation where these exist. At the level of the individual participant, the development of agri-environmental one-stop-shops in member states for all schemes would allow transactions-cost economies, saving on the overhead costs of applying to different schemes with different objectives, as well as allowing a more integrated, less confused approach to participation. The longer-term value of farmer networks and capacity-building for agri-environmental management is important too. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|