海峡两岸机场法律地位比较研究

海峡两岸业已开展航空直航多年，但两岸航空立法差异明显，严重影响了航空直航的进一步推进。尽管两岸尚未统一，但航空直航却迫使两岸就法律协调问题尽快提出法律对策，以促进两岸航空直航，为解决相关争议提供制度选择。机场的法律地位涉及承运人、旅客及货主权利之保护基础，是两岸航空立法协调的重要内容之一。两岸对机场定义的差异立法反映了立法技术的不同。中国大陆立法将机场看作公共设施，而台湾地区立法未确认其公共基础设施或公益性设施地位。这种功能差异导致两岸机场管理的内在约束与外在强制完全不同，同时导致两岸机场私法地位呈现不同的面貌。

A Comparative Study on Legal Status of Airports on Both Sides of the Straits

The cross-strait flights have been developing tor years. However, there are great discrepancies between the air laws of the mainland and Taiwan, which hinders the development of cross-strait flights. For the purpose of promo- ting the cross-strait flights, settling down the relevant disputes, we should put forward countermeasures on coordina- tion of the conflicts of air laws of the mainland and Taiwan. The legal status of airport, which plays a vital role in co- ordinating the legislation on aviation of Two Sides of tile Straits, is one of tile protection bases of rights and interests of carrier, passenger and owner of cargo. As far as the legal system of airport is concerned, the different definition of airport reflects the discrepancies of legislation technology concerning air law. In the mainland, an airport is defined as a public infrastructure, while in Taiwan an airport is a locus publics/public place？, whose services are rendered by enterprises. The functional difference thus leads to internal and external constraints on airport management, as well as the discrepant legal status from the perspective of private law.