犯罪构成体系之共性研究

犯罪构成体系在结构表现上“仪态万千”，在达致犯罪认定的结果上“殊途同归”，其体系内涵均强调犯罪认定主观方面的总领地位，凸显客观方面对主观方面的印证作用，侧重犯罪人格的预防功能，体现思维的渐进性，囊括举证责任的合理分配。世界三大犯罪构成体系的中核将主观认定贯穿始终，并恪守客观方面印证主观方面之原则，正确厘清刑事诉讼法和刑事实体法在犯罪认定中的各自作用，具有贴近民意，契合实情之功效，予以合理把握均能在犯罪认定中发挥积极作用。犯罪构成体系仅是犯罪认定的方法和工具，无优劣之分，有适正把握之别。

Study on the Common Theory of Constitution of Crime

Crime constitution system has diverse structural differences, but all achieve the result of confirm the crime. The connotation of the system stresses the subjective aspect of criminality, and highlights of the effect of objective aspects on subjectivity, focusing on the prevention of criminal personality, reflecting progressive thinking and including a reasonable allocation of the burden of proof. The world''s three main systems of crime constitution stress on subjective cognizance throughout, while taking into account the objective aspects, clarifying the criminal procedure law and criminal substantive law correctly in criminal cognizance of the respective role. They are close to public opinion and truth, the reasonable interpretation of which can play a positive role in criminal investigation. The system of constitution of crime is only methods and tools, without inherent merits, whose effects depend on proper understanding.