再论"李约瑟难题"--兼评《对‘李约瑟难题'质疑的再反思》

"李约瑟难题"之所以提出和迟迟得不到解决,主要是因为包括李约瑟在内的许多人没有搞清楚中国科学与西方科学、科学与技术、科学与经验、经验技术与科学技术之间的本质差异,并且用所谓"辩证"的、"联系"的观点把它们混为一谈所致.我们只要运用概念明晰的形式逻辑方法对之进行严密的逻辑分析,就会发现"李约瑟难题"完全是一个毫无研究价值的"伪问题".

A Further Discussion of "Needham Puzzle"--Simultaneously Commenting on "Further Reflection on the Query of Needham's Puzzle"

The reason "Needham Puzzle" was put forward and has not been solved for a long time is mainly that most people, including Joseph Needham, are not clear about the essential differences between Chinese science and Western science, science and experience, science and technology, technology of experience and technology of science, and lump together these four pairs of categories by so called "dialectical" and "associative" viewpoints. We can find that "Needham Puzzle" is a completely worthless pseudo-problem under the strict analysis in line of formal logic with distinct concepts.