| 试比较摩尔根和恩格斯的研究方法——以《古代社会》和《家庭、私有制和国家的起源》为例 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张春枝.试比较摩尔根和恩格斯的研究方法——以《古代社会》和《家庭、私有制和国家的起源》为例[J].学术探索,2012(12):14-16. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张春枝 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 武汉大学马克思主义学院,湖北武汉430072 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 摩尔根的《古代社会》一书的出版,受到了马克思和恩格斯的高度评价,他的伟大贡献为恩格斯完成《家庭、私有制和国家的起源》奠定了基础。他们分别运用不同的研究方法,殊途同归,成功了揭示了马克思主义的唯物史观。
|
| 关 键 词： | 研究方法 质性研究法 历史与逻辑相统一研究法 |
A Comparison of the Methodologies between Engels and Morgan--Taking The Ancient Society and The Origins of Family, Private Ownership and Nation as Examples |
| |
| ZHANG Chun-zhi.A Comparison of the Methodologies between Engels and Morgan--Taking The Ancient Society and The Origins of Family, Private Ownership and Nation as Examples[J].Academic Research,2012(12):14-16. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Chun-zhi |
| |
| Institution: | ZHANG Chun - zhi (School of Marxism, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, Hubei, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The publication of The Ancient Society written by Morgan won high praise from Karl Marx and Friederich Engles. Morgan＇s great contributions laid the foundation for Engles to finish The Origins of Family, Private Ownership and Nation. Al- though different methodologies have been applied in the two books respectively, the two writers managed to reveal historical mate-rialism of Marxism successfully. |
| |
| Keywords: | methodology qualitative method united approach of history and logic |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
