| 浅论承揽合同与雇佣合同的区分规则 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 谢友清,张春华,曹佃州.浅论承揽合同与雇佣合同的区分规则[J].西南科技大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2006,23(1):28-32. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 谢友清 张春华 曹佃州 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 江苏警官学院警察管理系 江苏南京210016(谢友清)，南京航空航天大学法律系 江苏南京210016(张春华，曹佃州) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我国《合同法》对承揽合同作了专章规定,但对雇佣合同未予明确。根据传统理论,涉及不动产的雇佣合同,往往与承揽合同难以区分。《物权法(草案)》没有对我国的不动产范围明确规定。实践中,只有做到对涉及不动产的承揽与(雇佣)合同进行正确有效的判别,方能保护当事人的合法利益,体现社会公平、正义。以一个具体案件为例,建立起雇佣合同和承揽合同的区分体系,并阐述了区分两类合同的实践意义。
|
| 关 键 词： | 雇佣合同 承揽合同 不动产 责任主体 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-4860(2006)01-0028-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005年9月12日 |
On the Differences Between the Contract to Work and the Contract to Employ |
| |
| Xie Youqing,Zhang Chunhua,Cao Dianzhou.On the Differences Between the Contract to Work and the Contract to Employ[J].Journal of Southwest University of Science and Technology,2006,23(1):28-32. |
| |
| Authors: | Xie Youqing Zhang Chunhua Cao Dianzhou |
| |
| Abstract: | The Contract Law of China makes out the special rule about the contract to work,but does not define clearly the contract to employ.According to the traditional theory,if the transaction concerns real estate,it is difficult to set apart those two contracts.The Proprietary Rights(draft) does not clarify the scope of real estate too.But only when the two contracts are properly distinguished,can the actors' rights and interests be well protected and the social justice be well shown.Based on a concrete case,a differentiating system is formed about these two contracts,and the practical significance of the distinguishing is expounded. |
| |
| Keywords: | contract to employ contract to work real estate main responsible body |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
