论我国行政合同司法救济制度的不足及完善

2014年11月1日通过的新行政诉讼法明确把行政合同纳入了受案范围，填补了立法上的空白。但因行政合同的识别标准尚未统一，致使司法实践中行政合同究竟是作为行政案件还是民事案件受案依然难以抉择。即使部分案件进入了行政诉讼，也因各地法院采用的审查模式及举证责任不同而导致判决结果各不相同。针对以上问题，本文提出以下对策建议:一是统一行政合同识别标准并用列举清单式明确受案范围；二是改变传统司法审查标准，合理分配举证责任；三是明确界定调解原则的适用内容。通过这三个方面的程序构建，进一步完善我国当前行政合同司法救济制度。  

On the Defects and Perfection of Judicial Relief System of Administrative Contract in China

The new Administrative Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China was passed on November 1, 2014, and it explicitly put the administrative contract into the scope of accepting cases, which filled the gap in the legislation of the administrative contract. However, the identification standard of administrative contract has not been unified, so in the judicial practice, it is still difficult to decide whether it is an administrative case or a civil case. Even if some cases enter into the administrative proceedings, due to the differences of local courts in review mode and burden of proof, it always leads to different verdicts. To solve the above problems, this paper puts forward the following countermeasures: first, unifying the identification standard of administrative contract and making a list of case scope; second, changing the traditional judicial review standard and the burden of proof should be reasonably allocated; third, making a clear definition of the applicable scope of the mediation principle. These three aspects of construction are supposed to further improve the current judicial relief system of administrative contract in China.