摒弃贡献率思维的产业生产率和总量生产率关联研究

本文参考OECD《生产率测算手册》,针对国内MFP研究存在的问题，提出研究者测算与政府机构测算的差别；对有形技术变化和无形技术变化的正确理解；要素服务量作为要素投入量的合理性；并对产业MFP和总量MFP相互关联的现实意义等进行了阐述。在此基础上，利用2005-2011年我国分地区分行业统计数据，效仿《生产率测算手册》提出的思路和方法，运用T?rnqvist MFP指数，从各地区大类行业开始，通过门类MFP、三次产业MFP，建立起与总量MFP之间的关联，并进行了简要的分析。

Correlation Study on Industrial MFP and Total MFP Without Regard to the Contribution rate

In view of current problems of research on Multi-Factor Productivity (MFP) in China, this paper proposed the differences between MFP measurements of researchers and government agencies and expounded accurate understanding of tangible and intangible technological changes and rationality of taking the amount of factor services as inputs. Then the paper pointed out the realistic meaning of linking industrial MFP to total MFP referring to Measuring Productivity-OECD Manual. Based on the foregoing analysis, the paper calculated industrial MFP of each region using industrial statistical data of each region in China from 2005 to 2011 according to the method proposed in the manual, namely T?rnqvist MFP index, and established a link between industrial MFP and total MFP, on which a brief analysis was also made.