首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

对法院调查取证的理解
引用本文:张珍珍. 对法院调查取证的理解[J]. 淮海工学院学报(社会科学版), 2010, 8(10): 49-51. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-3499.2010.10.015
作者姓名:张珍珍
作者单位:西北师范大学政法学院,甘肃兰州730070
摘    要:在我国,法院的调查取证权包括两个方面:一是法院可以根据案件的需要和自己的意志,主动调查和收集证据;二是指法院只能根据当事人的申请,按照当事人的申请调查收集证据。在我国民事诉讼中,无论是按照申请调查收集的证据,还是依据职权主动调查收集的证据,都可以作为法院裁判的依据。

关 键 词:法院  调查取证  当事人主义  调查人

Understanding of the Courts' Investigation and Proof Collection
ZHANG Zhen-zhen. Understanding of the Courts' Investigation and Proof Collection[J]. Journal of Huaihai Institute of Technology, 2010, 8(10): 49-51. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-3499.2010.10.015
Authors:ZHANG Zhen-zhen
Affiliation:ZHANG Zhen-zhen(School of Law and Politics,Northwest Normal University,Lanzhou 730070,China)
Abstract:In China,the courts' investigation and proof collection can be classified into two categories:those done actively by the court in accordance with the need of the legal case or the court's duty,and those done in response to the accusers' application.Both can be treated as lawful evidence for juridical judgment in domestic civil lawsuit.
Keywords:court  investigation and proof collection  accuser orientation  investigator
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号