首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Double vision: reply to Freese and Powell
Authors:Horwitz Allan V  Videon Tami M  Schmitz Mark F  Davis Diane
Institution:Department of Sociology, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research, Rutgers University.
Abstract:Freese and Powell make a number of critiques of the theoretical assumptions, statistical methods, and use of variables in our paper, which raises questions about the typical use of the equal environments assumption in twin research. We do not find that any of their critiques modify our conclusion that the equal environments assumption cannot be taken for granted but must be subjected to empirical testing. We hope that our paper and the resulting exchange will lead sociologists to become more actively involved in the debate regarding the extent of genetic and environmental influences on social behaviors.
Keywords:
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号