首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

英法行政诉讼外救济手段比较与借鉴
引用本文:陈中泽,何琳.英法行政诉讼外救济手段比较与借鉴[J].武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版),2002,15(6):553-556.
作者姓名:陈中泽  何琳
作者单位:武汉理工大学,人文社科系,湖北,武汉,430063
摘    要:诉讼外救济虽不是行政救济的主要途径 ,但它却是不可缺少的行政救济途径 ,是诉讼救济的必要补充和辅助 ,有着诉讼救济所不能或难以涉足的功能。因此对于诉讼外救济途径应给予更多的重视。文章通过英法两个代表性国家的行政诉讼外救济手段之比较 ,进一步研究我国诉讼外救济制度

关 键 词:行政救济  议会救济  行政监察专员制度
文章编号:1671-6477(2002)06-0553-04
修稿时间:2002年10月17

Comparison of the Relief Means beyond Executive Lawsuit between Britain and France and Its Enlightenment on China
Chen Zhongze,He Lin.Comparison of the Relief Means beyond Executive Lawsuit between Britain and France and Its Enlightenment on China[J].Journal of Wuhan University of Technology(Social Science Edition),2002,15(6):553-556.
Authors:Chen Zhongze  He Lin
Abstract:Relief means beyond lawsuit,thought not a major means of executive relief,is a dispensible executive relief means.It is a necessary supplement to lawsuit relief and it also has those functions that the lawsuit do not have.Thus,relief means beyond lawsuit should be paid more attention to.The paper compares the relief means beyond executive lawsuit between Britain and France so as to further study our country's system of relief means beyond lawsuit.
Keywords:Administrative succour  congress succour  ombudsman system
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号