首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

功能适当原则与宪法解释模式的选择——从美国"禁止咨询意见"原则开始
引用本文:张翔. 功能适当原则与宪法解释模式的选择——从美国"禁止咨询意见"原则开始[J]. 学习与探索, 2007, 0(1): 112-117
作者姓名:张翔
作者单位:中国人民大学,法学院,北京,100872
基金项目:司法部法治建设与法学理论科研项目
摘    要:宪法解释应当以何种方式展开是中国宪法学需要解决的重大课题。通过对美国1793年确立的“禁止咨询意见”原则的探究可知,宪法解释模式的选择必须与宪法解释机关的功能相适应。虽然各个国家确立了不同的宪法解释模式,但基本上都体现了“功能适当原则”。中国现有体制下的宪法解释只能适用抽象解释的模式,宪法解释程序的建立也必须以此为前提。

关 键 词:宪法解释  "  禁止咨询意见"  原则  功能适当原则  抽象解释  具体解释
文章编号:1002-462X(2007)01-0112-06
修稿时间:2006-10-10

Functional Propriety Doctrine and the Choice of the Constitutional Interpretation''''s Mode——Beginning with the "Advisory Opinion Ban" of U. S. A.
ZHANG Xiang. Functional Propriety Doctrine and the Choice of the Constitutional Interpretation''''s Mode——Beginning with the "Advisory Opinion Ban" of U. S. A.[J]. Study & Exploration, 2007, 0(1): 112-117
Authors:ZHANG Xiang
Abstract:One of the main questions of constitutional research of China is the mode of constitutional interpretation.This article started with the precedent "advisory opinion ban" established in 1793,and argued that the mode of constitutional interpretation must suit the functions of the organ which had the power of interpretation.From the Principle of functional propriety,this article argued that under the current system,the only possible mode of China constitutional interpretation is abstract interpretation.
Keywords:constitutional interpretation  advisory opinion  the principle of functional propriety  abstract interpretation  concrete interpretation  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号