首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

"问题"与"主义":两种思想谱系的历史演绎--从知识社会学的视角看《新青年》和《每周评论》的衔接
引用本文:张宝明. "问题"与"主义":两种思想谱系的历史演绎--从知识社会学的视角看《新青年》和《每周评论》的衔接[J]. 南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学 ), 2004, 41(2)
作者姓名:张宝明
作者单位:武汉大学,历史系,武汉,430072
摘    要:“问题”与“主义”的论争在本质上还是意识形态内在规定性的冲突。五四以来两种思想谱系分别以不同的变形进行着思想的交锋。从《新青年》和《每周评论》演绎出的思想史命题来看,今天的学术立意不应该总是停留在孰胜孰负的判别上。作为启蒙思想史的一桩公案,“问题与主义之争”是思想史上一次双赢的典型个案。

关 键 词:问题与主义之争  <新青年><每周评论>

"Issues" and "Isms": The Historical Evolution of Two Pedigrees of Ideology--A Look at the Joining of New Youth and Weekly Review from the Perspective of Intellectual Sociology
ZHANG Bao-ming. "Issues" and "Isms": The Historical Evolution of Two Pedigrees of Ideology--A Look at the Joining of New Youth and Weekly Review from the Perspective of Intellectual Sociology[J]. Journal of Nanjing University(Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences), 2004, 41(2)
Authors:ZHANG Bao-ming
Abstract:The argument between "issues" and "isms" is in essence a natural conflict in ideology. Since the May 4th Movement, the two pedigrees of ideology were confronting with each other in various forms. From the perspective of the topics of the ideological history that evolved from New Youth and Weekly Review, the present academic conception should not remain at the stage of judgment of winners or losers. As a public case in the history of enlightenment, the argument between " issues" and " isms" was a typical example of win-win situation.
Keywords:the argument between "  issues"   and "  isms"  ,New Youth,Weekly Review
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号