首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

钟嵘《诗品序》"赏究天人"、"学究天人"辨析--兼论六朝之际"赏"这一美学范畴的确立
引用本文:赵树功. 钟嵘《诗品序》"赏究天人"、"学究天人"辨析--兼论六朝之际"赏"这一美学范畴的确立[J]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2005, 0(6): 57-62
作者姓名:赵树功
作者单位:宁波大学,文学院,浙江,宁波,315211
摘    要:钟嵘<诗品序>中有"赏究天人"之说,一些学者认为是"学究天人"之误.事实上这并不是失误,这可以从以下几个方面得到说明第一,"赏究天人"不仅可通,而且更能体现六朝文人的审美倾向;第二,从校勘依据上看也有可商榷之处;第三,如果以"赏究天人"为误,而改为"学究天人",则与钟嵘在<诗品>中体现的反对以学为诗、倡导直寻的一贯思想不合;第四,与序言中的语境不合;第五,与当时的玄学审美思潮不合;而"赏究天人"说法的出现,正可说明"赏"作为一个美学范畴在当时的影响.

关 键 词:诗品序  辨正    审美范畴  
文章编号:1001-9839(2005)06-0057-06
修稿时间:2005-03-07

Discussion of "Shang Jiu Tian Ren" in "the Preface of Shi Pin" from the Understanding to "Shang" of Literatis in Six Dynasties
ZHAO Shu-gong. Discussion of "Shang Jiu Tian Ren" in "the Preface of Shi Pin" from the Understanding to "Shang" of Literatis in Six Dynasties[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2005, 0(6): 57-62
Authors:ZHAO Shu-gong
Abstract:Some scholars think,it is not "shang jiu tian ren"but "xue jiu tian ren"in the preface of Shi Pin.In fact,this is a wrong.It can be explained through below sides:"Shang jiu tian ren"not only smooth,but also express the tendency of aesthetics that time even more;Some material can be discussed in the basis of"xue jiu tian ren";If "xue jiu tian ren"is correct,it violate a principle of Zhong Rong who advocate that the poem should be created through feeling,not though knowledge;It is not conform to the situation of words and the trend of thought of XuanXue.This opinion's spreading shows the aesthetic category's influence.
Keywords:the preface of Shi Pin  discussion  Shang  category of aethetic
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号