略论朝鲜古史谱系的演变

金富轼《三国史记》确立＂三国＂、王氏高丽、李氏朝鲜的古史谱系之后,13世纪出现了一然《三国遗事》和李承休《帝王韵记》两种不同的朝鲜古史谱系,试图捏合古朝鲜、扶余、三韩三种不同古史系统,对后世影响极大。14—15世纪流行的朝鲜古史谱系则不包括扶余系统。17世纪的许穆以夫娄为檀君之子的神话为基础,整合三种古史系统,以古朝鲜系统为中心,建立了新的朝鲜古史谱系。18世纪流行的朝鲜古史谱系是对许穆说的修正,主要是淡化扶余系统,并将在中国正史四夷传中占有重要地位的沃沮、秽貊诸族纳入朝鲜古史谱系,较具代表性的是安鼎福的《东史纲目》,在补入渤海国之后,这种朝鲜古史谱系一直流行至今。对朝鲜古史谱系的认识比较符合历史事实的是韩百谦,但其观点未能为后来的学者所接受。

On the Change of Korean Ancient History Genealogical System

This article aims at arganizing the thread of thought of the system of formation and change of Korean ancient history to help to understand Korean history and some scholars outlook of the national history. The genealogical system of Korean ancient history is established in Samguk. The genealogical system of Korean ancient history in 13th century attempts to tie together ancient Korea,Puyo and Samham as different systems, which exert a significant influence on later ages. The popular genealogical system of Konean ancient history in 14 - 15th centuries exclude Puyo system. A new genealogical system of Korean ancient history in 17th century keeps ancient Korean system as the base. The genealogical system of Korean ancient history in 18th century further weakens Puyo system and includes Bohaiguo, which indeed this genealogical system of Korean ancient history has been handed down to this very day. Han Baiqian＇ s understanding of the genealogical system of Korean ancient history conforms relatively to historical facts,yet his viewpoints are not accepted by later scholats.