| 仁、义的本义与演变 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 谢维俭. 仁、义的本义与演变[J]. 社会科学, 2007, 0(11): 142-148 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 谢维俭 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 上海社会科学院邓小平理论研究中心,上海,200020 |
| |
| 摘 要： | "仁"与"义"是先秦时期至高的范畴,是古代文化两个重要的"遗传密码"。儒学与墨学的根本分歧在于"仁"与"义"哪个应该放在首位。儒家特别看重亲情,强调对内要"仁",这同孔子本人的经历有很大的关系,用"精神分析法"来解释,这属于个体的"潜意识"和"前意识"。"仁"与"义",一个是维系亲情;一个是卫护公道。所谓"仁内义外"主要是强调在家族内部讲"仁",在外面讲"义"。然而,在古汉语中,一个符号可以包含多项所指。所以,仁、义、内、外的意思都不是唯一的。孟子不赞同"仁内义外",实际上是否定了私德与公德的区别。后世的统治者赞赏孟子,不过,他们的意图不在"天下一家",而在"家天下"。
|
| 关 键 词： | 儒家 墨家 仁内义外 家族制 |
| 文章编号： | 0257-5833(2007)11-0142-07 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007-08-30 |
Original Meaning and Evolution of Concept 'Benevolence' and 'Justice' |
| |
| Xie Wei-jian. Original Meaning and Evolution of Concept 'Benevolence' and 'Justice'[J]. Journal of Social Sciences, 2007, 0(11): 142-148 |
| |
| Authors: | Xie Wei-jian |
| |
| Affiliation: | Xie Wei-jian |
| |
| Abstract: | Benevolence and Justice were two important norms in traditional culture. The essay analyzes Confucian's concept "Benevolence" and "Justice" and compares them with Mohism. The fundamental difference between these two groups was whether benevolence should be preferable or not. It also examines the doctrine "benevolence-internal and justice-external" . |
| |
| Keywords: | Confucian Mohism Benevolence-internal and justice-external Family system |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
