| 浅论《十七史商榷》中的“议论”、“褒贬” |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘玲. 浅论《十七史商榷》中的“议论”、“褒贬”[J]. 中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版), 2006, 8(1): 114-118 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘玲 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 安徽大学,历史系,安徽,合肥,230039 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 《十七史商榷序》明确反对对史书的“议论褒贬”,但《十七史商榷》对典制史事的议论褒贬不在少数,二者并不矛盾。王鸣盛反对的是那种热衷于评论、不辨史实真伪的“议论褒贬”。其主旨是突出《十七史商榷》考据成就,同时也体现了乾嘉时代的“求实”精神。
|
| 关 键 词： | 王鸣盛 《十七史商榷》 “议论褒贬” |
| 文章编号： | 1009-105X(2006)01-0114-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-01-15 |
Comment and appraisment" for the Discussion of Seventeen Ancient Historial Work |
| |
| LIU Ling. Comment and appraisment" for the Discussion of Seventeen Ancient Historial Work[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology(Social Sciences), 2006, 8(1): 114-118 |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Ling |
| |
| Abstract: | Through analysing Wang Ming-Sheng's view of "comment and appraisment" and some examples in Discussion of the Seventeen Ancient Historial Work,this author reaches a conclusion that Wang Ming-Sheng made no difficulty for historian comment and appraisment;but he was against comment and appraisment coming from those who had read Seventeen Ancient Historial Work but didn't examine and correct mistakes.The purpose is to highlight textual research achievements of the Discussion of Seveuteen Ancient Nistorical Work and also embody the practical spirit of the time. |
| |
| Keywords: | Wang Ming-Sheng The Discussion of Seventeen Ancient Historial Work comment and appraisment |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
