| 英语科学论文的评价意义比较——以优劣性评价为例 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 袁邦株,徐润英.英语科学论文的评价意义比较——以优劣性评价为例[J].井冈山大学学报（社会科学版）,2014,35(6):126-131. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 袁邦株 徐润英 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 井冈山大学外国语言研究所,江西吉安,343009 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 江西省社科规划项目“语料库辅助下的科学论文评价比较研究”，江西省高校人文社科项目“英语科学论文的评价资源研究” |
| |
| 摘 要： | 科学论文作为报道学术成果和研究发现的语篇,其中必然包含各种评价性资源。借用语料库的方法,考察学术论文中优劣性评价资源在不同学科论文中的分布。统计表明,人文学科中优劣性评价词汇使用频率最高,其次为社会科学和自然科学学科,这与学科本身内在属性、研究对象和知识结构有关。从词性的使用看,名词和形容词评价词汇使用频率最高,这从一个侧面说明科学论文更愿意使用较为客观的名词性结构作为评价的主要手段。
|
| 关 键 词： | 学科论文 评价资源 比较 |
Comparative Study of Appraisal Meaning in Scientific Academic Papers——A Study of Good Appraisal as Example |
| |
| YUAN Bang-zhu,XU Run-ying.Comparative Study of Appraisal Meaning in Scientific Academic Papers——A Study of Good Appraisal as Example[J].Journal of Jinggangshan University(Social Sciences Edition),2014,35(6):126-131. |
| |
| Authors: | YUAN Bang-zhu XU Run-ying |
| |
| Institution: | (School of Foreign Languoges, Jinggangshan University, Ji＇an 343009, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Various appraisal resources are represented in the scientific academic papers aiming at reporting academic discovery. This paper, by using corpus method, seeks to compare the Goodness Appraisal features in academic papers of three disciplines, i.e. natural science, social science and humanity. It shows that,Goodness Appraisal words are more densely distributed in humanities papers than in social science and natural science papers. And nouns and adjectives are more likely to use for evaluation in all scientific papers. |
| |
| Keywords: | academic paper comparison appraisal resource |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
