| 共犯人分类比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李祖华. 共犯人分类比较研究[J]. 浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2008, 33(2): 88-93 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李祖华 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 浙江师范大学法政与公共管理学院,浙江,金华,321004 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 由于共同犯罪的情况比较复杂，因此如何准确地追究各共犯人的刑事责任成为困扰刑事立法和理论界的一个难题。为解决共犯人的刑事责任，世界上许多国家或地区采取了对参与共同犯罪的行为人进行类型划分的方法。那么，将共犯人划分为不同的类型是否必要？按照什么标准来划分共犯人？不同共犯人的体系设置是否合理等问题有待进一步分析探讨。本文以大陆法系国家或地区和我国的立法规定及理论研究为基础，对上述问题予以比较分析，并提出自己的陋见。
|
| 关 键 词： | 共犯人 体系 法定种类 区分标准 分类的标准 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-5035(2008)02-0088-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007-12-02 |
Joint Offenders: A Typological and Comparative Study |
| |
| LI Zu-hua. Joint Offenders: A Typological and Comparative Study[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Normal University:Social Sciences, 2008, 33(2): 88-93 |
| |
| Authors: | LI Zu-hua |
| |
| Affiliation: | LI Zu-hua ( College of Law, Political Science ＆ Public Administration, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Owing to the complexity of joint offenses, it becomes a difficult problem for criminal legislators as well as for the academic circles to identify the respective criminal liability of joint offenders. To solve the problem, many countries and regions in the world have adopted the typology of joint offenders. Is it, then, really necessary to divide joint offenders into different categories？ What criteria is the typology based on？ Does the differentiation system hold water？ Further analyses and discussions are required to answer all these questions. The present paper, based on the legislative theory and practice in China as well as in other civil law countries, attempts to answer these questions and propose the author＇ s personal opinions. |
| |
| Keywords: | joint offenders system legal typology standards of differentiation typological criteria |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
