首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

胡绳与中共党史学范式研究论析
引用本文:汪兵.胡绳与中共党史学范式研究论析[J].北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2018,34(5):91-98.
作者姓名:汪兵
作者单位:安徽师范大学 马克思主义学院,安徽 芜湖241003;安徽农业大学经济技术学院,安徽合肥230013
基金项目:安徽省教育厅2015年省级研究项目“《中国近现代史纲要》基础理论问题研究”(编号为2015jyxm708)
摘    要:改革开放以来,中共党史研究及其学科建设能顺利推进的一个重要原因,是党史研究者对于其学科建设理论问题研究的重视。在党史学范式研究方面,胡绳运用革命史范式和现代化范式的视角与方法解读中国近代史以及中共党史的进程,并且深刻地阐述了这两种史学范式之间的关系,还有力地回击了“告别革命”论的错误观点。他关于党史学范式问题研究的意义,主要在于充实了党史学范式研究的内容,提升了党史研究的理论思维以及为完善党史学的“中介理论体系”指明了方向。 

关 键 词:胡绳  中共党史研究  理论和方法  革命史范式  现代化范式
收稿时间:2018-06-25

Hu Sheng and Research Analysis on the Historiography Paradigm of the Communist Party of China
Institution:1. College of Marxism, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241003, China;2. College of Economics and Technology, Anhui Agriculture University, Hefei 230013, China
Abstract:Since reform and opening up, an important reason which developed the research and its disciplinary construction of the history of CPC, is the importance attached to the research of discipline construction on the circles. In the study of the history of the party paradigm, Hu Sheng has applied the paradigm of the revolutionary history and perspectives and methods of the modernized therory, to interpret the process of the of Chinese modern history and the history of the Communist Party of China; described the relationship between the two historical paradigms; and forced against the wrong idea of “farewell to revolution”. The important influences of his researches are reflected in the following aspects: enriching the paradigm theory of the history of CPC, improving the theoretical thinking of the research on the history of CPC, and pointing out the direction for constructing the intermediary theory system of the historiography of CPC. 
Keywords:
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《北京科技大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《北京科技大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号