应激视角下的正义起源新探

由西方思想家提出并发展的关于正义起源问题的研究具有“自证效应”，其论证方式充满主观想象，缺乏客观性。因此，有必要跳出人文社会科学“循环论证”的怪圈，适时引入自然科学的理论和方法，运用应激理论来解释正义的起源问题。文章认为，由加拿大病理学家汉斯·塞利提出的应激理论为正义的起源问题提供了新的思路:正义的产生过程实际上也是一个应激反应的过程。资源的不合理分配是应激源，抗争与妥协是应激反应在行为上的表现，而正义的产生可以看作是应激反应的结果。这也正是正义起源的条件、路径和标志。作为一种尝试，应急理论视角下的正义起源研究可以看作正义理论在当代的一种新发展，是否还有更科学和更合适的理论可以应用在研究正义的起源问题上，仍值得期待。 

A New Exploration of the Origin of Justice from the Perspective of Stress

The study on the origin of justice proposed and developed by western thinkers has self-evidence effect. The way of the argumentation is full of subjective imagination and lack of objectivity. Therefore, it is necessary to jump out of the circle of the circular argument of the humanities and social sciences, introduce theories and methods of natural sciences in a timely manner, and explain the origin of justice by using the stress theory. According to this paper, the stress theory put forward by Hans Selye, a Canadian pathologist, provides a new way to explain the origin of justice. The process of justice is actually a process of stress response. The irrational distribution of resources is the source of stress, the resistance and compromise are the behavior of stress response, and the emergence of justice can be regarded as the result of stress reaction. That’s to say, these are the condition, path and symbol of the origin of justice. As an attempt, the study of the origin of justice from the perspective of stress theory can be regarded as a new development of justice theory in the contemporary era. It is still worth looking forward to that whether there is a more scientific and appropriate theory applicable to the study of the origin of justice.