首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

马克思人权批判思想的方法论探析
引用本文:郭大林.马克思人权批判思想的方法论探析[J].广州大学学报(社会科学版),2013(9):25-29.
作者姓名:郭大林
作者单位:重庆大学法学院,重庆400045
摘    要:马克思人权思想与西方古典人权思想在方法论上的区别在于:前者坚持社会历史唯物主义,后者则是形而上学理性主义.具体表现在人权本源问题上的先验论与实践论,人权实现上的分离论与辩证论的分疏.基于方法论上的不同,马克思人权思想的旨趣从以抽象人权、价值人权、普遍人权为内容的应然人权转移到了以具体人权、事实人权、特殊人权为内容的实然人权.但这种转移并非是对应然人权的简单否定,而是一种批判.

关 键 词:社会历史唯物主义  理性主义  人权  方法论

Research on the Methodology of Marx's Critical Thought of Human Rights
Guo Dalin.Research on the Methodology of Marx's Critical Thought of Human Rights[J].Journal of Guangzhou University(Social Science Edition),2013(9):25-29.
Authors:Guo Dalin
Institution:Guo Dalin School of Law, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China )
Abstract:The difference between Marx's human rights thoughts and western classical ones in methodology lies in that the former insists on historical materialism but the latter takes metaphysical rationalism, presenting as two distinctions : apriorism and practice on resources of human rights and separation and dialectic on realization of hu- man rights. Based on differences in methodology, the purport of Marx's human rights thoughts transfers from "what should human rights be", including abstract human rights, value human rights, and universal human rights, to "what are human rights", including specific human rights, valuable human rights and special human rights. How- ever, the transfer does not simply deny "what should human rights be", but criticizes it.
Keywords:social - historical materialism  rationalism  human rights  methodology
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号