首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Land use conflict after the wildlife and countryside act 1981: the role of the farming and wildlife advisory group
Authors:Graham Cox  Philip Lowe  Michael Winter
Institution:1. University of Bath, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Bath, U.K.;2. Bartlett School of Architecture & Planning, University College London, 22 Gordon Street, London WC1H 0QB, U.K.;1. University of Bath, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Bath, U.K.
Abstract:As the conflict between agriculture and conservation in Britain continues, the farming and landowning lobby has placed increasing emphasis on the Farming and Wildlife Advisory Group (FWAG). This paper examines the development of FWAG as a mechanism for self-regulation through a voluntary and co-operative approach to conservation within the farming community. FWAG, until recently accorded little attention either by farmers or government, now enjoys considerable patronage, and new-found financial support from the Countryside Commission. As the National Farmers' Union (NFU) and Country Landowners' Association (CLA) seek to contain the tide of criticism of activities in the countryside FWAG, essentially a practical advisory body, has assumed a crucial ideological importance in the presentation of the farmers' traditional case of ‘stewardship’ and ‘good husbandry’. The paper concludes by stressing the dilemma facing the NFU and CLA as they seek to satisfy the wishes of their own members, government and the conservation lobby.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号