民事裁判文书说理的实践与思考*——基于人民法院民事裁判文书公开的反思

最高人民法院《关于人民法院在互联网公布裁判文书的规定》生效后，符合公开条件的生效裁判文书已基本实 现公开。从现有的裁判文书公开情况来看，实践中裁判文书存在逻辑性不强，证据分析不足，法律适用说理不充分等情况，本 文以民事裁判文书为例，从说理的原则、说理的内容、说理的方法、说理的语言规则四个维度对民事裁判文书说理情况进行分 析，提出应当建立和完善案例指导制度、裁判文书技术规范、法官责任制、裁判文书考评制度等方式，保障裁判文书说理公开。

Practice and Reflection of Open Reasoning in Civil Judgment Documents:Based onthe Refection of the Civil Judicial Documents Disclosure of People's Court

After Rules about the People''s Court Publishing Judgment Documents on Internet issued by the supreme people''s court comes into effect, eligible documents has been mostly public-based. Existing public, however, stops at formality, open about magistrate reason, which is related to substantive equality, is not in place. There are a lot of civil judgment documents lacking of logicality, evidence synthesis, and explanation of applicable law. After analyzing principal, content, method and language rules of open reasoning, we propose establishing and improving case guidance system, technical specifications, judge responsibility and documents evaluation mechanism to guarantee public of magistrate reason.