| 汉布林论评估论证的三种标准 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 蔡广超.汉布林论评估论证的三种标准[J].延安大学学报(社会科学版),2009,31(1):20-23. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 蔡广超 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 延安大学,政法学院,陕西,延安,716000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 论证评估是论证逻辑的核心，评估标准的确立是论证评估得以展开的基础。在《谬误》中，汉布林分析、评述了论证评估的真值的、认识的和辩证的标准，三种标准彼此相互兼容、互相补充，体现了论证的实践的和语用的维度。
|
| 关 键 词： | 汉布林 论证 真值标准 认识标准 辩证标准 |
Hamblin's Commentary on Three Criteria of Argument Evaluation |
| |
| CAI Guang-chao.Hamblin''s Commentary on Three Criteria of Argument Evaluation[J].Journal of Yan'an University (Social Science Edition),2009,31(1):20-23. |
| |
| Authors: | CAI Guang-chao |
| |
| Institution: | CAI Guang-chao (College of Political Science and Law, Yanan University, Yanan, Shaanxi 716000) |
| |
| Abstract: | Argument evaluation is the core of the argument,while the basis of argument evaluation is the establishment of evaluation criteria. In fallacies, Hamblin analyzed and commented on the criteria of argument evaluation from three aspects, which are the alethic criteria, the epistemic criteria and the dialectical criteria. These three kinds of criteria, which are mutually compatible and complement each other, reflect practical and pragmatic dimension in nature of argument. |
| |
| Keywords: | C L Hamblin argument the alethic criteria the epistemic criteria the dialectical criteria |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
