首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论土地用益物权制度的三种研究视角
引用本文:侯银萍,朱孟烈.论土地用益物权制度的三种研究视角[J].辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010,38(6):138-141.
作者姓名:侯银萍  朱孟烈
作者单位:[1]浙江工业大学法学院,浙江杭州310014 [2]浙江省温岭市人民检察院,浙江温岭317500
摘    要:土地用益物权制度的研究在当前中国具有巨大的现实意义和实践价值,对相关研究视角与方法的思考更是科学解读该问题的关键与核心。目前,学界关于该问题的研究视角主要包括传统法学视角、传统经济学视角和法经济学视角。传统法学视角关注该制度在规范层面的理解和运用;传统经济学视角重视对该制度的绩效进行经济分析;而法经济学视角由于实现了实证分析与规范分析的结合,静态分析、比较静态分析与动态分析的结合,图表分析与案例研究的结合,比较制度与历史分析的结合,故而取得了研究视角和方法上的突破与超越。

关 键 词:土地用益物权制度  法学视角  经济学视角  法经济学视角

On Three Research Perspective as to the Usufruct of Land Immovables
HOU Yin-ping,ZHU Meng-lie.On Three Research Perspective as to the Usufruct of Land Immovables[J].Jounal of Liaoning University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition),2010,38(6):138-141.
Authors:HOU Yin-ping  ZHU Meng-lie
Institution:1.Law School,Zhejiang University of Technology,Hangzhou 310023,China; 2.The People's Procuratorate,Wenling 317500,China)
Abstract:The research about the usufruct of land immovables in China has enormous practical value and significance.The research perspectives and thinking patterns are the key to scientific interpretation of the problem.Currently,the academic perspectives on the issue are traditional legal perspective,the conventional economic view and the view of law and economics.The traditional legal perspective concerns the understanding and application of the system specification;the conventional economic view refers to the economic analysis of the system's performance;the view of law and economics surpasses the traditional research perspectives,because it achieves the combinations of empirical and normative analysis,static and dynamic analysis,graph analysis and case study,and systematic comparison and historical analysis.
Keywords:the usufruct of land immovables  legal perspective  economic view  the view of law and economics
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号