首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论产品责任惩罚性赔偿的主观要件
引用本文:罗蕾. 论产品责任惩罚性赔偿的主观要件[J]. 理论界, 2014, 0(3): 90-93
作者姓名:罗蕾
作者单位:中国人民大学法学院,北京100872
摘    要:我国《侵权责任法》第47条明确规定了产品责任的惩罚性赔偿,其中"明知产品存在缺陷仍然生产、销售"为主观构成要件,本文认为,这里的"明知"指明确知道行为必然或可能导致产品缺陷,而不包括对人身损害结果的明确理解。同时,"明知"不仅包括恶意和一般故意(直接故意和间接故意),还包括"准故意"即重大过失在内。此外,根据《侵权责任法》第46条的规定,生产者和销售者对于缺陷产品违反召回义务的,亦可构成上述"明知",并在造成他人死亡或健康严重损害时承担惩罚性赔偿的侵权责任。

关 键 词:惩罚性赔偿  明知  恶意  一般故意  重大过失

On the Subjective Elements of Product Liability Punitive Damages
Luo Lei. On the Subjective Elements of Product Liability Punitive Damages[J]. Theory Horizon, 2014, 0(3): 90-93
Authors:Luo Lei
Affiliation:Luo Lei (Law School, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)
Abstract:The Article 47 of Tort Law in China clearly defines the punitive damages m product liability, including " knowingly produce and sell defective products " as the subjective components. This paper argues that " knowingly" here means clearly knowing the act will or is likely to result in product defects, and does not include the result for a clear understanding of personal injury. Meanwhile, the " knowing" includes not only malice and intentional (direct and indirect intentional) , also includes " quasi-intentional" or gross negligence. Besides, according to the Article 46 of Tort Law, producers and sellers break the recall obligation for defective products, which also constitutes the " knowingly" , and they will bear the punitive damages when causing death or serious harm to the health.
Keywords:punitive damasee  knowingly  malic  intentional  gmes negligence
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号