中国乡村治理创新的区域差异

中国东部乡村和中西部乡村存在着经济社会发展程度的差异，这影响了乡村治理创新的方向和路径，由此产生治理创新的区域差异。东部乡村的治理内容超越了村庄的消化能力，推动了治理单元上移，并形成了行政化和市场化的治理路径；中西部乡村面对的主要问题是要素流失带来的生产生活秩序失调，治理单元下移是有效的治理创新方向，且需要发掘社会动员的治理意义。因此，乡村治理创新应在治理目标和治理手段适配的条件下因地制宜回应不同区域的问题，尤其应重视中西部乡村在治理创新方面的主体性，探索乡村治理现代化的多元路径。

Regional Differences in Rural Governance Innovation in China

There is a gap in the degree of economic and social development between the eastern, the central and western countryside, which affects the direction and path of rural governance innovation, thus generating regional differences in governance innovation. The governance content of the eastern countryside has exceeded the village''s digestion capacity, promoted the governance unit to move up, and formed the governance path of administerization and marketzation. The main problem facing rural areas in central and western China is the disorder of production and life order caused by the loss of factors. The downward movement of governance units is an effective direction of governance innovation, and the governance significance of social mobilization needs to be explored. Therefore, the innovation of rural governance should respond to the problems of different regions according to local conditions under the condition of the adaptation of governance objectives and governance means. In particular, we should pay attention to the subjectivity of the central and western rural governance innovation and explore the multiple paths of rural governance modernization.