Examining the Reliability and Validity of the Fisher Divorce Adjustment Scale: The Persian Version |
| |
Authors: | Faramarz Asanjarani Maryam Fatehizade Ozra Etemadi Jan de Mol |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Counseling, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran;2. Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium |
| |
Abstract: | This study was an attempt to determine the factor structure, reliability, validity, and adaptation of the Fisher Divorce Adjustment Scale (FDAS) for Iranian divorced individuals. The primary rationale for this study was the lack of such an instrument in an Iranian context to help researchers and therapists determine postdivorce adjustment and distinguish those in need of receiving psychological help. Participants of this study were 486 individuals (49.5% men, 50.5% women) who were divorced and were selected from the available population. Participants were asked to complete a sociodemographic questionnaire, the FDAS (Fisher, 1978), the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS; Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin, 1985), and the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ; Ghanbarnejad & Turki, 2013). The results showed that the internal consistency of FDAS using Cronbach’s alpha was .93 and the split-half coefficient was .89, indicating fine consistency. Also, the internal consistency of FDAS subscales measuring self-worth, disentanglement from the ex-partner, anger, grief, social trust, and social self-worth was .81, .86, .89, .88, .86, and .69, respectively, using Cronbach’s alpha. Data analysis shows an adequate convergent validity with the SWLS and GHQ. It can be concluded that the FDAS has an acceptable factor structure, reliability, and validity, and can be used in Iran and other Persian-speaking countries. |
| |
Keywords: | adjustment to divorce divorce Fisher Divorce Adjustment Scale |
|
|