首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

陈寅恪先生“胡化”、“汉化”说的启示
引用本文:林悟殊. 陈寅恪先生“胡化”、“汉化”说的启示[J]. 中山大学学报(社会科学版), 2000, 40(1): 42-47
作者姓名:林悟殊
作者单位:中山大学历史系,广东 广州 510275
摘    要:陈寅恪先生把胡化、汉化的问题视为中国中古史发展中的一个关键环节他抓住这一关键环节,解释了历史发展中的一系列问题。“胡化”、“汉化”说,是陈先生史学思想的一个重要组成部分,其在这个问题上的一系列精辟论述,对于我们研究中国中古史,有着重要的参考价值,甚至具有指导性的意义。这一学说在50年代曾受到不公正的批判,今天重新学习、研究他这一学说,吸取其精华,对于我们匡正形而上学、教条主义、浅薄浮躁的学风,尤有特别的意义。

关 键 词:陈寅恪  胡化  汉化  隋唐  史学思想  史学方法  文化史观
文章编号:1000-9639(2000)01-0042-06
修稿时间:1999-11-30

Enlightenment by Prof.Chen Yin-ke's Theory on Foreignization and Sinicization
Lin Wushu. Enlightenment by Prof.Chen Yin-ke's Theory on Foreignization and Sinicization[J]. Journal of Sun Yatsen University(Social Science Edition), 2000, 40(1): 42-47
Authors:Lin Wushu
Abstract:Prof. Chen Yin-ke regards foreignization and Sinicization as the key links in the Chinese historic development in the Middle Ages, with which he explains a whole series of questions in the historical development. Prof. Chen's theory on foreignization and Sinicization is an important component part of his historiographical thought. A number of his brilliant expositions on it have great significance and even guiding importance in the study of Chinese history in the Middle Ages. However, his theory was unfairly criticized in the 1950's. The reconsideration of his theory and the absorption of its quintessence are beneficial not only to the prosperity of the academic circles, the contention of various schools of thought and the promotion of history research, but also to the rectification of the metaphysical, dogmatic, superficial, and impatient research styles.
Keywords:Chen Yin-ke  foreignization  Sinicization  Sui-Tang Dynasty  the thought of history  the method of history  the cultural history view  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号