首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

英语学术论文中的遁言研究
引用本文:丁展平.英语学术论文中的遁言研究[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2002,32(6):108-114.
作者姓名:丁展平
作者单位:浙江大学外国语言学与应用语言学系,浙江,杭州,310027
摘    要:学术论文写作并非是不受作者主观影响的就事论事的客观陈述,成功的学术英语写作需要借助遁言运用以达到特定的交际目的.对遁言的运用和分布的研究结果表明:遁言是学术语篇社团成员广泛使用的一种修辞手段,学术英语中的遁言现象不仅是作者、读者、语篇三者交互的结果,也是用语言形式体现作者心理取向的产物,是一种认知情态.遁言研究对学术英语具有重要意义.

关 键 词:学术英语写作  遁言运用  认知情态  
文章编号:1008-942X(2002)06-0108-07
修稿时间:2001年11月23

Hedging in English Academic Writing
DING Zhan,ping.Hedging in English Academic Writing[J].Journal of Zhejiang University(Humanities and Social Sciences),2002,32(6):108-114.
Authors:DING Zhan  ping
Abstract:Academic writing is rich in hedged propositions. Although it has long been associated with a series of objective and impersonal statements of fact, effective academic writing depends on hedging to achieve the intended communicative purpose. This paper analyses 20 research articles selected from two leading scientific periodicals in an attempt to explore the use of hedges in academic writing. The result indicates that hedging in English academic writing is a rhetoric means widely employed by relevant academic discourse community members, and an outcome of interaction between author, reader and text. Hedging is not only used to avoid absolute statements that might put the author into an embarrassing situation, but also used to negotiate the right representation of the state of the knowledge under discussion. Therefore, hedging is also the product of a mental attitude that looks for prototypical linguistic realization, and thus an epistemic modal by nature. Hedging study is of great significance to academic English, and plays an important role in assisting learners to develop an awareness of the correct use of hedges.
Keywords:academic writing  hedging  interaction  epistemic modal
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号