首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

未决羁押性质之比较研究
引用本文:杨开湘,张丹丹. 未决羁押性质之比较研究[J]. 昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2008, 8(7): 91-98
作者姓名:杨开湘  张丹丹
作者单位:中南大学法学院,湖南长沙,410083;中南大学法学院,湖南长沙,410083
摘    要:未决羁押在不同的社会形态中反映出不同的性质,在不同的诉讼阶段也有不同的意义,基本上已经成为一种制度化的刑事诉讼强制措施。分析西方各国未决羁押制度的现状可以总结出各国未决羁押的特点。从这种比较中可以更好地理解我国未决羁押的现状和特点,也可以看到我国学术界对未决羁押性质的模糊认识所带来的问题。如欲解决这些问题,我国需要确定未决羁押的法定化,建立未决羁押的司法审查机制,未决羁押的司法救济机制,使未决羁押成为一个较封闭的司法控制系统。

关 键 词:未决羁押  性质  比较研究

A Comparative Study of the Nature of Pretrial Detention
YANG Kai-xiang,ZHANG Dan-dan. A Comparative Study of the Nature of Pretrial Detention[J]. Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences), 2008, 8(7): 91-98
Authors:YANG Kai-xiang  ZHANG Dan-dan
Affiliation:YANG Kai - xiang, ZHANG Dan - dan( Law School of Central South University, Hunan Changsha 410083, China)
Abstract:Pretrial detention reflects the different nature in different society,and also has different meaning in different stage of litigation.It has already become an institutionalized coercive measure of criminal procedure basically.Through analyzing the current situation of pretrial detention in western countries,we can summarize its nature in different countries.And we can comprehend the nature and the current situation of pretrial detention in china much better from this comparison.In the same time,we can conclude the problems which are brought from the vague cognition of academe to the nature of pretrial detention in our country.For solving these problems,China needs to confirm the legalization of pretrial detention,establish the judicial review mechanism and judicial relief mechanism of pretrial detention,making pretrial detention become a more closed judicial control system.
Keywords:pretrial detention  nature  comparative study  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号