| 关于恩格斯"本原"观的一点辨析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 汪继存. 关于恩格斯"本原"观的一点辨析[J]. 安徽理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2004, 6(2): 1-4 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 汪继存 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 安徽师范大学经济法政学院,安徽,芜湖,241000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 世界本原说是旧哲学的哲学理论,在马克思主义哲学看来,世界无本原可言;恩格斯使用“本原”一词的视角及含义与旧哲学的世界本原说有着本质的区别,“世界本原”的提法不符合恩格斯的本意;“世界本原是物质”这一命题在理论上存在着一些困境,这一命题只能是一个旧唯物主义的命题。
|
| 关 键 词： | 恩格斯 本原 旧哲学 物质 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-1101(2004)02-0001-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004-02-08 |
A differentiation and analysis of Engles's views on the "Arche" |
| |
| WANG Ji-cun. A differentiation and analysis of Engles's views on the "Arche"[J]. Journal of Anhui University of Science and Technology:Social Science, 2004, 6(2): 1-4 |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Ji-cun |
| |
| Abstract: | Theories of the world's arche only belong to the old philosophy. In the view of Marxist Philosophy, the world has no "arche". In essence, the standpoint and opinion of Engles differ widely from the old philosophy on the world's arche. The formulation, which is "the world's arche", is inconsistent with the views of Engles. As there are many confusions about the topic that the world's origin is matter, it can only be regarded as a topic of the old materialism. |
| |
| Keywords: | Engles arche the old philosophy matter |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
