从学术期刊看当前文艺学批评的严重缺失——以《中国社会科学》、《文学评论》、《文艺研究》等为样本的分析与探讨

当前学术期刊中的文艺学批评缺失严重,其突出表现主要有两个方面:一是"主批评"与"次批评"的地位颠倒,认真严肃的"指名批评"匮乏;二是没有多大学术意义的"栏目"五花八门,而具有重要学术意义的"学术批评"栏目却未得到应有的重视。总之,文艺学批评乃至整个哲学人文社会科学批评任重道远,尽管目前它还存在着诸多的问题,但只要紧紧围绕学术期刊、批评队伍、理论武装和评价机制等四个方面来做工作,就必定有进步,也必定有收获。

Severe Drawbacks in Current Literary and Artistic Criticism from Academic Journals

A survey and an analysis of the articles on literary and artistic studies in over 30 academic journals published from 2005 to 2009 were made and a further exploration was conducted on this basis. There exist severe drawbacks in the current literary and artistic criticism, which is shown in the following two aspects. The first is the reversion of "the major criticism" and "the minor criticism," with no adequate serious criticism "definitely targeted." The second is the phenomenon of all sorts of bizarre columns with no much academic significance, but there is no sufficient attention to the column of "academic criticism" with enormous academic value. There is a long way to go for the literary and artistic criticism or even all the areas of philosophy, humanities and social sciences. The following four aspects should be particularly addressed: academic journals, critic team, theoretical equipment, and assessment mechanism.