首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

对安德森知识划分理论的解构与再划分
引用本文:焦秋生,徐志梅.对安德森知识划分理论的解构与再划分[J].山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2010,55(6):106-110.
作者姓名:焦秋生  徐志梅
作者单位:山东师范大学人口.资源与环境学院,山东济南250014
摘    要:安德森(J.R.Andersen)将多种划分标准混淆在一起对知识进行划分,使人无法辨别陈述性知识和程序性知识这两个概念的能指(符号的音形)和所指(符号的意义)。从音形上看,这两个概念似乎是有区分的,但从意义上看,这两个概念的区分度非常低。几乎没有不能被陈述的知识,也没有不具备程序的知识。所谓不能用语言表达的程序性知识不是一种知识,而是个体内部的自我监控能力。

关 键 词:安德森  知识  划分标准的多样性  联结引力关系  解构与划分

Deconstruction and Reclassification of Andersen's Knowledge Classification Theory
Jiao Qiusheng,Xu Zhimei.Deconstruction and Reclassification of Andersen's Knowledge Classification Theory[J].Journal of Shandong Teachers' University(Social Science Edition),2010,55(6):106-110.
Authors:Jiao Qiusheng  Xu Zhimei
Institution:( School Of Population, Resources and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, Shandong 250014)
Abstract:As the head of psychologists, J. R. Andersen, classifies knowledge with a variety of criteria which are confused by him, making it impossible to distinguish the signifier (audio- shape of symbolic) and signified (symbolic meaning) of these two concepts of declarative knowledge and procedural knowledge. From the view of audio - shape, it seems there is a distinction between these two concepts, however, from the view of meaning, the distinction is slight. Almost "all knowledge can be stated and all knowledge has procedures. So - called procedural knowledge that can not be expressed in language is not knowledge, and it is the individual's internal self - monitoring capability.
Keywords:knowledge  diversity of criteria for the classification  link gravity relation  deconstruction and classification
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号