首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

事实探知模式的发展与证明标准的确定
引用本文:程政举.事实探知模式的发展与证明标准的确定[J].河南社会科学,2006,14(1):80-82.
作者姓名:程政举
作者单位:郑州大学,历史学院,河南,郑州,450052
摘    要:自从人类社会产生以来,人类就在解决各种矛盾和纠纷的过程中生存和发展,探求事实真相一直是各个社会在处理各种矛盾和纠纷时追求的共同目标和判案标准。神灵裁判是古代社会人们在解决疑难案件时才采用的一种方法,并不占主流地位,占主流地位的判案方法则是探求案件事实真相,循实情而断案。在事实探知模式方面,人类经历了以直觉经验为主的模糊真实到以理性经验为主的形式真实,再到规则意识较强的法律真实的发展过程。我国应确立法律真实的证明标准,在民事诉讼中对疑难案件的处理采取盖然性占优势的证明标准。

关 键 词:纠纷解决  证明标准  事实探知
文章编号:1007-905X(2006)01-0080-03
修稿时间:2005年12月29

Recognition of the Model of Seeking Truth in the Cases and the Proving Standard
Cheng Zhengju.Recognition of the Model of Seeking Truth in the Cases and the Proving Standard[J].Henan Social Sciences,2006,14(1):80-82.
Authors:Cheng Zhengju
Abstract:Since the beginning of human society, seeking truth has been the common aim and the judicial standard that all kinds of societies have tried to attain in order to settle disputes. Spiritual adjudication was a method that people adopt only when they were settling doubtful and difficult cases in the ancient society, but it was not the main method of settling disputes. The main method of settling disputes was to seek truth and settle the disputes according to truth. The method of seeking the truth in settling disputes has changed from the indistinct truth in which the sense experience plays an important role through formal truth in which rational experience plays an dominant role to the procedural truth in which strict procedure must be carried out. China should construct the proving standard of the procedural truth and adopt the proving standard of preponderance of the possibility to settle the doubtful civil cases.
Keywords:settling disputes  proving standard  seeking the truth  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号