首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

追诉恐怖主义犯罪的职责与自由裁量权
引用本文:谢佳,张国臻. 追诉恐怖主义犯罪的职责与自由裁量权[J]. 贵州大学学报(社会科学版), 2010, 28(3): 48-53
作者姓名:谢佳  张国臻
作者单位:最高人民检察院监所检察厅,北京100726;;河南许昌市魏都区人民检察院,河南许昌461000;
摘    要:联合国安理会1317(2001)号决议将联合国反恐公约和议定书连接成一个统一的反恐法律框架。这法律框架的核心目的就是追诉恐怖分子并使其在世界各国均无处藏身。但是反恐委员会对该决议追诉恐怖分子的条款作出了错误的解释,使其与国际公约以及各国司法实践产生了矛盾。文章首先介绍联合国追诉恐怖分子的法律框架,并分析这样的追诉职责是否存在着自由裁量权,试图解决这一矛盾。

关 键 词:恐怖主义  “绳之于法”  自由裁量权

The Duties and Discretion of Prosecuting Terrorist Crimes
XIE Jia,ZHANG Gui-zheng. The Duties and Discretion of Prosecuting Terrorist Crimes[J]. Journal of Guizhou University(Social Science), 2010, 28(3): 48-53
Authors:XIE Jia  ZHANG Gui-zheng
Affiliation:XIE Jia , ZHANG Gui-zheng (Department of Prison Supervision, Supreme People's Procuratorate , Beijng, 100726, China; Weidou People's Procuratorate , Xuchuang , Henan , 461000, China)
Abstract:The 1317 (2001) Conventions by the United Nations Security Council has connected The United Nations Conventions on Terrorism and Protocols into one legal framework against terrorism. The core purpose of this legal framework is the prosecution of terrorists and make them no place to hide in any country around the world. However, the CTC makes a wrong interpretation about the terms of prosecution of terrorists, and makes them conflicted with the international conventions and judicial practice in different countries. This paper describes the legal framework of the United Nations prosecution of terrorists, and then analyzes to see whether there is a prosecution duty discretion to resolve this contradiction.
Keywords:terrorism  justice  discretion
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号