不动产善意取得中无权处分认定研究

借名登记中出名人处分不动产的行为存在有权处分和无权处分两种不同的观点。出名人的处分应属于有权处分，第三人无论善意还是恶意，均得在合同有效的前提下取得不动产所有权，无须适用不动产善意取得制度。冒名处分他人不动产有无权处分和无权代理两种不同观点。冒名处分不动产，应属于无权代理行为，不能适用不动产善意取得。登记名义共有人处分不动产也有有权处分和无权处分两种不同观点。登记名义共有人处分不动产是无权处分行为，善意第三人可依据《物权法》第106条的规定主张善意取得。

Research on Unauthorized Disposal in Bona Fide Acquisition of Real Estate

There are two different points of view about the right of the name lender in legal relation of borrowing name to register. The positive view is that the name lender has the right to dispose of the immovable property, and the negative one is that the name lender does not have the right. The author holds the positive view, and based on which, the third party, who has made a valid contract with the name lender, has the right to acquire immovable property right, without considering whether the third party has good faith or not. The second controversial topic is about the nature of the act of disposition under somebody else's name. Some hold that it is a behavior of unauthorized disposal, and others take it as a behavior of an unauthorized agency. Standing behind the latter view, the author thinks that the act of disposition under somebody else's name should not apply to the system of Bona Fide Acquisition of immovable property. Finally, when common immovable property is registered under only one party's name, does this party have the right to dispose of the common property or not? The author holds that the party does not have the right to dispose of it without consent of other co-owners, and a Bona Fide third party has the right to claim it according to Article 106 of Property Law.