首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

非法持有宣扬恐怖主义网络物品的司法认定
引用本文:陈小彪,刘锋.非法持有宣扬恐怖主义网络物品的司法认定[J].重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2019,31(2):47-55.
作者姓名:陈小彪  刘锋
作者单位:西南政法大学法学院,重庆,401120;西南政法大学法学院,重庆,401120
基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目:文化安全的刑法保护研究(16BFX062)
摘    要:非法持有宣扬恐怖主义物品罪中的宣扬是指以非否定的评价对恐怖主义内容予以不合理的展示,只有当涉及恐怖主义的内容通常会对阅读者产生刑法所禁止的负面影响,才属于宣扬恐怖主义物品。宣扬恐怖主义物品包含传统物品与网络物品两种形式,在定量模式的运用上,应当秉持传统物品与网络物品危害性区分的原则。对于网络物品,存在着因软件原因而使软件用户被动获取的可能,当软件用户被动获取的系完全独立的网络物品时,则负有删除所获取网络物品的义务,不履行删除义务的属于持有。基于正当目的而持有宣扬恐怖主义物品的行为不具有刑事违法性,不应认定为犯罪。行为人非法持有后又实施宣扬行为的,如持有行为与宣扬行为所指向的物品具有同一性,宜以包括一罪处断。

关 键 词:宣扬恐怖主义网络物品  删除义务  正当目的  包括一罪
收稿时间:2018/10/1 0:00:00

Judicial Determination of Illegally Holding the Online Materials Advocating Terrorism
CHEN Xiaobiao and LIU Feng.Judicial Determination of Illegally Holding the Online Materials Advocating Terrorism[J].Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications:Social Science Edition,2019,31(2):47-55.
Authors:CHEN Xiaobiao and LIU Feng
Institution:Law School, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, China and Law School, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, China
Abstract:The promotion of illegal possession of the terrorism articles refers to the unreasonable display of the content of terrorism with non-negative evaluation. Only when the content of terrorism in articles usually has a negative effects prohibited by criminal law on readers, does it commit the promotion of terrorism materials. The materials advocating terrorism include traditional and online ones. We should base on the principle of distinguishing harmfulness between traditional and online materials in the application of quantitative model. As for online materials, there is the possibility of passive acquisition by software users for software reasons. When what software users passively acquire is completely independent from online materials, they have the obligation to delete the acquired online materials, and those who fail to fulfill the obligation to delete are people holding the materials advocating terrorism. Holding for legitimate purpose is not criminally illegal and criminal. People who advocate materials of terrorism after holding them will be sentenced as an inclusive offense if the materials are identical. It is an inclusive offence.
Keywords:online materials advocating terrorism  obligation to delete  legitimate purpose  inclusive offence
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号